Direct Conversion Mixer for WiFi 802.11a

#🎯todo

Assets

References

Specifications

Metric Target Single-Balanced Double-Balanced
IIP3 > 5 dBm 5.9 dBm 5 dBm
Conversion Gain > -7 dB -6.9 dB -5.2 dB
Integrated Output Noise < 11μVrms 7.9 μVrms 11.2 μVrms
Mixer Power 0.66 mW 1.68 mW
Local Oscillator Power (PLO) -2 dBm -2 dBm

Research

source: RF Microelectronics - Chapter 6, p.337

A Mixer translates a signal to a different Frequency by multiplying it with a single tone. In an RF Receiver (RX), and RF signal is multiplied with a local local oscillator (LO) to produce a baseband or Intermediate Frequency (IF) signal. In an RF Transceiver (TX), an IF signal is multiplied with a LO to produce a RF signal. IF is the difference between Center Frequency (fRF) and LO frequency (fLO), IF=|fRFfLO|.

!400
RF Microelectronics, p.338

The mixer above uses a single-ended RF input and LO, leading to an inefficient LO, where the RF input is discarded for half the time. A more efficient topology is a single-balanced mixer, where two differential switches are used that commutate (toggle) the RF signal between two output paths. This topology leads to two main benefits; conversion gain is doubled compared to single-ended topology, and Charge Injection from the switches is eliminated. Though LO-IF Clock Feedthrough remains an issue. A double-balanced mixer solves this by connecting two single-balanced mixers such that they cancel clock feedthrough at IF port without affecting the IF signal.

!400
RF Microelectronics, p.348

!200
RF Microelectronics, p.349

The above are passive mixers, where mixing is done without any additional power (apart from PRF and PLO). Conversion gain with the double-balanced passive mixer is 2/π -4dB. Active mixers integrate gain and mixing in a single stage with a Transconductance input. These also come in single-balanced and double-balanced forms, where the gain for both is given by

Av=2πgm1RD

!200
RF Microelectronics, p.369

!400
RF Microelectronics, p.370

Design

single-balanced mixer:
!single-balanced-mixer-sch.svg#invert

double-balanced mixer:
!double-balanced-mixer-sch.svg#invert

In both topologies, the load resistor (Rd) is in parallel with the output capacitor (Cload). This forms a low pass filter at the IF port whose 3 dB bandwidth must be designed to be larger than IF frequency (20 MHz).

f3dB=12πRDCload
fif = 20 MHz
Cload = 110 fF

Rdmax = 1/ (fif * 2 * pi * Cload)

To begin the design, some rough initial assumptions must be made for the overdrive voltage (Vov) for the mixer transistors, here 0.15V is a safe choice. Output voltage swing is limited to VDD2Vov in single-balanced, and VDD3Vov in the double-balanced. The can use the latter for both to simplify the designs. Maximum Rd must be decided according to this voltage to ensure the transistors stay in saturation.

Rd,max=2VIF,ppIbias
Vov = 0.2 V
Vdd = 0.9 V
Id1 = 500 uA

Vpp = Vdd - (3 * Vov)
Rd = 2 * (Vpp / Id1)

Assuming Ibias = 500 μA, the maximum Rd is quite large, showing that there is more than enough voltage headroom for this design. To minimize Thermal Nosie, Rd can be set lower. 100 Ω is be used for now. The required gm to meet conversion gain specification (-7 dB) can now be determined by the following

Av=2πgm1RD
Rd = 100 ohm
gain = -7
Av = 10^(gain/20) V/V
gm1 = Av / (Rd * 2/pi)

To ensure a good balance between gain and linearity, a Vov of 0.15 is selected for M1. Below the required ID1 and W1 is calculated to get the desired Vov.

gm1 = 7 mS
vov = 0.15 V
id = vov*gm1/2


l = 20 nm
kn = 480 uA/(V^2)
W =  (l * 2 * id) / (kn * vov^2) 

The best performance was achieved with mixing switches set to a low Vov. This doesn't align with gmID methodology rules where a low Vov results better gain but worse noise and linearity. #🎯todo Need to revisit these simulations.

Both the single- and double-balanced mixers used the same input and switching devices, as well as the same PLO. ID needed to be increased to achieve the desired gain and linearity.

Metric Single-Bal. Double-Bal.
Input Devices M1,4 10μm/20nm 10μm/20nm
Switching Devices M2,3,5,6 30μm/20nm 30μm/20nm
RD 100 Ω 100 Ω
ID1 588 μA 880 μA
Mb 3μm/20nm 4.8μm/20nm
Mt 80μm/20nm
Iref 150 μA 110 μA
Bias filter Rb, Cp 20 kΩ, 100 fF

Simulations

1. Testbench

!testbench-sch.svg#invert

!Pasted image 20251119155106.png

!Pasted image 20251119155013.png

PORT_RF Setup

PORT_LO Setup

PORT_IF Setup

Variables

2. Conversion Gain

Analyses Setup

Direct Plot Form

3. Noise

Analyses Setup

Direct Plot Form

4. IIP3

Analyses Setup

Direct Plot Form

Results

single-balanced mixer:
!400

double-balanced mixer:
!400

Powered by Forestry.md